This supports full drag and drop, like the corresponding folder in the folder tree - You can drag messages on it to move/copy them to the folder, and access the bookmarked folders through keyboard. When you drag a mail folder to it, you get a tab that acts as shortcut to that mail folder. This extension adds an extra toolbar to Thunderbird.
![]() ![]() Bug: Outlook 15.32 Drag And Drop Email In Both Folders Full Drag AndI even mentioned this in comment #7. It is not> - the headers take up a lot of screen space that is only useful occasionally> (most of the time one is reading the message body, not the headers).- The boundary between message list pane and preview pane is movable- in the message window, the lack of screen space is not so extreme(and IIUC, the preview pane is just a frame with a message window in it: AFAICT anything that applies to the one applies to the other, except the binding with the selected message in the message list pane)> - you cannot select and copy the headers, or even just names from the headersOh but I can, in Thunderbird 2.0.0.17pre and SeaMonkey 2.0a1pre both: drag the mouse then hit Ctrl-C, or right-click a name then "Copy Email Address". That's about the only integration points I see with the toolbar and menu bar.Just to note that there are other designs up: Some are not as far along as others like the attachments display being worked on.> Tony: Please read the history of bug 9942 to get some background. But the toolbar changes, if any, should be a separate bug. This is about looks, but also usefulness if someone sends a singe image attached we might as well allow it to take up a larger portion of the message space with the preview.Much of the toolbar items are going to be redundant to the actions available in this new message reader so that will have to be looked at. With the max-(width|height) CSS styling you can generally control things.Also, one more thing to bring up about image sizing is that it's worthwhile to use a larger preview of single attached image. For its relevance in the main window, keep in mind that most people would look at the messages with Headers > Normal setting, and the addresses are collapsed to a single line by default when opening the message, thus this case would only apply for the expanded headers.> ( comment #0) and buttons are located directly on the message itself.> The current message view pane only has scrolling for the message body itself> while the headers and actions are treated separately without scrolling.Well, the fact that action buttons are "floating" with the message in many web mail applications is what I particularly dislike, due to the lack of a fixed reference point. The thread list in the main window gives the reference to the message currently viewed, whereas there is no such reference in the stand-alone window at all, thus causing ambiguities. Here are the builds I just tested it with:Mozilla/5.0 (X11 U Linux i686 en-US rv:1.8.1.17pre) Gecko/2008081103 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17preMozilla/5.0 (X11 U Linux i686 en-US rv:1.9.1a2pre) Gecko/20080811001340 SeaMonkey/2.0a1pre> - it is more common with other mail clients (hence expected)The only non-mozilla non-netscape mail client I ever used (not including webmail) was Outlook Express on W98 many years ago, and IIRC it didn't have headers that scrolled away either> However, there may be some scenarios where headers always present are better.> Please *explain* them, don't just flame about this change being bad.I try not to flame in comment #7 (second half) already I mentioned several arguments.In the standalone message window I _most certainly_ want to see the headers at all times there there isn't such a lack of real-estate.While I see the argument of "real estate" in the 3-pane view, I'd definitely agree with retaining the headers visible all times in the stand-alone message window. Where are outlook for mac files storedIf you make that part of the message, you start searching for the action buttons as their locations are moving based on message size and any scrolling = not good.Sorry about comment #12, non-constructive comments are not what such a bug needs.1) Duplicating the functionality that we already have in a toolbar in the mail body sounds redundant and therefore unneeded to me.2) Displaying our own UI stuff (headers, delete attachment, buttons, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRichard ArchivesCategories |